UP Government Defends Kanwar The Uttar

 

Pradesh( UP) government lately defended its directive taking shop possessors along the Kanwar Yatra route to display their names prominently. This measure was intended to insure the peace and safety of the Kanwariyas, the pilgrims sharing in the periodic Kanwar Yatra. The directive faced challenges and was brought before the Supreme Court, which temporarily stayed the order on July 22, 2024

UP Government Defends Kanwar

 

The UP government‘s directive aimed to address complaints from Kanwariyas about confusion regarding the authenticity and medication of food served along the route. The state argued that the move was necessary to maintain order and respect for religious practices during the passage 【 9 † source 】. still, critics argued that the directive was discriminative and could produce societal divisions.

In its interim order, UP Government Defends Kanwar the Supreme Court stated that while beaneries could display the types of food being served, they shouldn’t be forced to display the names and particular details of the possessors and staff. The court has asked for responses from the governments of UP, Uttarakhand, and Madhya Pradesh and has listed further sounds

UP Government Defends Kanwar

The Uttar Pradesh government‘s directive taking shop possessors along UP Government Defends Kanwarthe Kanwar Yatra route to display their names prominently was intended to insure the safety and order of the periodic passage. The Kanwar Yatra is a significant religious event where millions of addicts, known as Kanwariyas, collect holy water from the Ganges River and carry it to their original Shiva tabernacles. The trip is marked by rigorous religious practices and rules, with some addicts not resting until their passage is complete 【 7 † source 】.

The state government‘s order was issued in response to complaints from Kanwariyas about confusion and enterprises over food authenticity along the route. The directive needed shop possessors to display their names, addresses, and contact details prominently to help insure that the food served met religious norms UP Government Defends Kanwar

still, the order was challenged in the Supreme Court

by the Association for Protection of Civil Rights( APCR) and other pleaders, who argued that the directive was discriminative and could lead to societal divisions. UP Government Defends KanwarThe Supreme Court, in its interim order, stayed the perpetration of the directive. The court ruled that while beaneries could display the types of food being served, they shouldn’t be forced to display the names and particular details of the possessors and staff. The bench issued notices to the governments of UP, Uttarakhand, and Madhya Pradesh and set a farther hail data

Critics of the directive, including opposition parties, argued that it wasanti-Muslim and could produce gratuitous societal pressures. The UP government defended its decision, stating that it was made to address specific complaints from pilgrims and insure a smooth and regardful passage

The Supreme Court’s interim order emphasized that food hygiene and quality were important but that calling the display of particular details of shop possessors and staff wasn’t necessary.UP Government Defends Kanwar The court has asked for farther responses from the concerned state governments and has listed another hail on the matter

The Uttar Pradesh government‘s directive for the Kanwar Yatra, which commanded that shop possessors along the yatra route display their names, has been a subject of contestation and legal scrutiny. UP Government Defends KanwarThe government argued that this order was intended to insure peace and order during the passage and to address complaints from pilgrims about confusion and enterprises regarding food quality and religious practices

still, the directive has faced significant counterreaction. Critics, including opposition parties and some NDA abettors , have indicted the government of creating gratuitous collaborative pressures and targeting specific communities. They argue that the order could lead to demarcation and isn’t supported by any legal enactment 【 20 † source 】 【 21 † source 】.

The Supreme Court of India interposed, issuing an interim stay on the directive. The court ruled that shop possessors are only needed to display the type of food served, rather than their names. This decision came in response to a solicitation from the Association of Protection of Civil Rights, which argued that the order was unconstitutional and promoted rejection grounded on identity 【 19 † source 】 【 21 † source 】.

The Kanwar Yatra is a significant Hindu passage that sees millions of addicts, known as Kanwariyas, trip to cost holy water from the Ganges. This time‘s yatra started on July 22 and will conclude on August